Search for: All records

ABSTRACT Using the youngest detrital-zircon date(s) of a sedimentary deposit to constrain its maximum depositional age (MDA) is a widespread and growing application of geochronology. Most MDA studies analyze zircon grains at random, but this strategy can be costly and inefficient in cases where the youngest age group is only a small fraction of the population. We propose that handpicking sharply faceted zircon grains will increase the likelihood of encountering first-cycle zircon that have not undergone significant sedimentary transport, thus producing MDA estimates that are closer to the depositional age. We evaluate this procedure by conducting intra-sample comparisons of randomly selected versus handpicked zircon separates from 30 samples analyzed via laser-ablation–inductively coupled plasma–mass spectrometry (LA–ICP–MS). Our results show that handpicking zircon produces an overall shift towards younger ages in comparison to their randomly analyzed counterparts by an average of ∼ 406 Myr. In randomly analyzed separates, only 1.6% of grains were within 5 Myr of an independent estimate of the MDA, while handpicked separates contained 14.2%, an approximately nine-fold increase. However, handpicking can also lead to selection of older grains if they have been minimally transported, as with one handpicked Mesozoic sample that yielded 81% of ∼ 1.1 Ga zircon interpreted to be derived from a local granitic source. Handpicking is most effective in samples where young, sharply faceted grains are diluted by older, rounded grains, as with one sample that exhibited an ∼ 18-fold increase in the proportion of near-depositional-age zircons relative to its counterpart where grain selection was random. Because handpicking zircon imparts a severe bias on the resulting U–Pb age distribution, we recommend that two separate aliquots be used for quantitative provenance characterization through random analysis and MDA analysis through handpicking. 

ABSTRACT Current investigations into the Albian–Cenomanian sedimentary record within the Western Interior have identified multiple complex tectono‐sedimentary process–response systems during the ongoing evolution of North America. One key sedimentary succession, the upper Cedar Mountain Formation (Short Canyon Member and Mussentuchit Member), has historically been linked to various regionally and continentally significant tectonic events, including Sevier fold‐and‐thrust deformation. However, the linkage between the Short Canyon Member and active Sevier tectonism has been unclear due to a lack of high‐precision age constraints. To establish temporal context, this study compares maximum depositional ages from detrital zircons recovered from the Short Canyon Member with that of a modified Bayesian age stratigraphic model (top‐down) to infer that the Short Canyon Member was deposited atca100 Ma, penecontemporaneous with rejuvenated thrusting across Utah [Pavant (Pahvant), Iron Springs and Nebo thrusts]. These also indicate a short depositional hiatus with the lowermost portion of the overlying Mussentuchit Member. The Short Canyon Member and Mussentuchit Member preserve markedly different sedimentary successions, with the Short Canyon Member interpreted to be composed of para‐autochthonous orogen–transverse (across the Sevier highlands) clastics deposited within a series of stacked distributive fluvial fans. Meanwhile, the muddy paralic Mussentuchit Member was a mix of orogen–transverse (Sevier highlands and Cordilleran Arc) and orogen–parallel basinal sediments and suspension settling fines within the developing collisional foredeep. However, the informally named last chance sandstone (middle sandstone of the Mussentuchit Member) is identified as an orogen–transverse sandy debris flow originating from the Sevier highlands, similar to the underlying Short Canyon Member. During this phase of landscape evolution, the Short Canyon Member – Mussentuchit Member depocentre was a sedimentary conduit system that would fertilize the Western Interior Seaway with ash‐rich sediments. These volcaniclastic contributions, along with penecontemporaneous deposits across the western coastal margin of the Western Interior Seaway, eventually would have lowered oxygen content and resulted in a contributing antecedent trigger for the Cenomanian–Turonian transition Oceanic Anoxic Event 2.